Sunday, February 24, 2008

ATS411 For March Madness and Conference Tournament Betting and More

Bulletin Board Material

There is some value to handicapping the intangible of so-called “bulletin board material”. That is one team with a player calling out the other team.  However sometimes it can benefit the trash talking team, other times a detriment.  There is a certain physiological warfare and we find a veteran player questioning the big game capabilities of a key young player on another team is does rather a player when things are going well.

Ironically the other extreme is that a well disciplined team can also be flustered.  The famed guarantees of Mark Messier, Joe Namath, and Jimmy Johnson are examples of the consistent and superior teams being taken off their single-mindedness.

One of the best assertions I’ve heard is from someone who believes handicapping the effects of such can have great value in football.  He believes practice preparation is much underrated—we do too as we’ve previously spoken of what great precursors “great week” or “poor week” of practices are.  He believes “bulletin board material” increases focus and determination during the week more than having a direct affect after kickoff. 

Contrary to popular belief, it’s worse to call out underachieving teams or players that need a wake-up call.  Why light a fire under Randy Moss? It’s the old why wake up a sleeping dog syndrome.

Conversely a top shelf team didn’t become that good by waiting for some blowhard on the other team to provoke them.  From a “face saving” standpoint, there are risks to calling out a much more exceptional opponent  However in 1994 when the Cowboys Jimmy Johnson took his dog Pokes to Candlestick Park and proclaimed “put it in three-inch headlines. We will win” he proved correct.  As Johnson correctly stated years later, he believes he got underneath the skin of the usually clearheaded collection of veteran future Hall-of-Famers as they engaged the Cowboys in a pre-game near brawl.

Thriving teams are more likely to be distracted by being on the giving or receiving end of calling out.  Struggling teams are more likely to be awoken.  In short, a big favorite does not need to have the boat rocked by a braggadocio on either team. 

The Dictionary as a Handicapping Tool

With conference tournaments followed by the Big Dance upon us at OffshoreInsiders.com, it is imperative we warn you against yet another dunce assumption that gamblers make about neutral site games, be it in football and basketball. Neutral according to the dictionary means “Not aligned with, supporting, or favoring either side in a war, dispute, or contest.”

The dumb cluck investor overplays road statistics when weighing performance to date.  This is a gross misapplication. A road game is a game on the opponent’s court. The oddsmakers absolutely are prepared for this common delusion.  A neutral court is just that—it’s no more a road game than a home game.

Of course we consider if one team has to travel much further or is bringing along a much larger supporting section, but that’s part of the research. And under that circumstance one team’s neutral game is more like a home than a road battle.

But the presupposition that one should handicap each team’s road performance disproportionately is not based on any factual historical data or simple common sense. Wise men handicap neutral games like the dictionary defines them, not as if each team is playing a road contest.   

Get your ATS411 at OffshoreInsiders.com All the information you need: databases, live odds for American Idol, the Academy Awards, March Madness betting and more

 

No comments:

Search Lines-Maker.com

Compare Betting Lines